*reads wired.com article* → *sees ad-blocker blocker blocking the site* → https://
SaltKin liked this post
Sam Hogg liked this post
@Bumi Not sure what you mean. It blocks the blocking modal thingy just fine. Knew it before from using the mobile version.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@skddc so you actually see the article? I thought wired would still show the add blocker site.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@Bumi But you're not using an ad blocker anymore. That's the nice thing about it.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@skddc I thought they are still blocking their adds, don't they? - and then show different ones more or less.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@Bumi It doesn't work like a normal ad blocker. And they don't show different ones yet (and you can opt in to that later).
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@Bumi How about you just try it out? ;)
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@skddc didn't get it running the other day so I was lazy trying it again...
also not sure if I am convinced of their concept.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@Bumi @skddc so this is a browser which requires configuring?
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@Bumi This might interest you: brave.com/assets/blog_im… -- also, just get the compiled binary.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
@oddtazz Not yet.
, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com
Also on: @skddc
@skddc which would not change anything, does it? you're still blocked with brave, as brave blocks their ads, no?
Michael Bumann, Apr 14 2016 on twitter.com