Skip to main content
 

Fun facts from our current provider evaluation at 5apps: Digital Ocean Spaces doesn't scale at all for our use case. Outright breaks sometimes, and responds with rate limiting errors at other times, when you hit it with not that many requests. With the same overnight test runs (backing up and restoring remoteStorage accounts using rs-backup), Exoscale Object Storage didn't even blink, and delivered rock-solid performance so far.

 

Would anyone find it terribly weird for remoteStorage to allow "If-None-Match" headers on PUTs, and returning 304 Not Modified in case the document already exists with that ETag? HTTP specs only mention it for GET and HEAD requests.

 

Already made lots of improvements to RS Inspector since I announced it recently. You can follow the releases and changes on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/skddc/inspektor/tags

 
 

Hanging out at in Potsdam today. Ping me if you want to chat about RemoteStorage, offline-first web apps, or @hackerbeach.

 

I hacked up a quick backup/restore tool for @remoteStorage_ during the weekend. Let me know if it works for you: https://community.remotestorage.io/t/rs-backup-a-bare-bones-backup-restore-program-i-just-made/322

← An IndieWeb Webring πŸ•ΈπŸ’ β†’